Issue 8

K. G. Kodancha et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 8 (2009) 45-51; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.08.04 49 of crack-tip plasticity. The magnitude of normalized T-stress for SENT specimen (a/W=0.5) obtained in 2D analysis reported by Sherry et al . [11] is -0.4 (shown by dotted line in Fig.6). In the present 3D analysis it is found that normalized T-stress for specimen having a/W=0.5, varies between -0.6 to -0.1 depending on the thickness of the specimen. As T- stress is used as constraint parameter, this result demonstrates that the constraint parameter is not a unique value; it varies along the thickness of the specimen. It is known that the magnitude of T-stress depends on the a/W ratio [11] of the specimen. The 2D results of Sherry et al . [11] shows that normalized T-stress is positive (0.1) for a/W=0.6. The FE results of variation of T-stress along the thickness of specimen with a/W =0.6 along with 2D results [11] is shown in Fig.7. It is interesting to know from this figure that the T-stress is negative on the surface of the specimens with higher thickness and vice versa. Figure 5 : Variation of B vs . a/W Figure 6 : Variation of normalized T-stress along the crack-front for various specimen thicknesses Figure 7 : Variation of normalized T-stress along the crack-front for various specimen thicknesses. Figure 8 : Variation of normalized T-stress along the crack-front for various a/W ratio and specimen thickness 10 mm. A typical variation of normalized T-stress (T/ σ ) along the crack-front for various a/W ratio and specimen thicknesses 10 mm along with 2D result [11] is shown in Fig.8. This figure shows the effect of a/W ratio on variation of T-stress along the crack-front. This analysis demonstrates that the studies on constraint issues based on T-stress estimated by 2D analysis leads to considerable error. Hence, it is required to conduct 3D analysis to completely assess the constraint issues in a fracture specimen having finite thickness. In this work, the variation of stress intensity factor along the crack-front is also studied. A typical plot of variation of K I along the crack-front along with theoretical magnitude of K I for a specimen with a/W=0.5 is shown in Fig.9. This figure indicates that the magnitude of K I is higher at the centre of the specimen than on the surface compared to theoretical magnitude. The nature of variation of K I shown in Fig.9 is in good agreement with the similar results presented by