Issue 8

R. Ghelichi et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 8 (2009) 30-44; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.08.03 42 And finally the effect of cold spray on residual stress in substrate is shown in Fig. 13. This graph displays in-plane stresses in the substrate before deposition and the coating–substrate system after deposition. The bare substrate exhibits ~90 MPa in compression at the surface, presumably due to peening effects of sand blasting. This is partially balanced by a tensile region (max 50 MPa) in the interior. Cold spray deposition induces a slight (average 10 MPa) compressive stress through the thickness of the coating, which thus reduces the near-surface substrate stress magnitude [60]. Figure 13: Residual stress measurement of CS Al coating [60]. C ONCLUSIONS any studied have being conducted since ten odd years ago about the cold spray coating and its related parameter. Many reviewers, as it is mentioned above, have been trying to survey different factors about CGDS such as calculation deposition efficiency, find a way, for example by changing the parameters, to increase the DE, critical velocity for different materials, effect of thermal annealing on cold spray, etc. Although the authors believe that the most important question remained vague is the main reason of bounding of the particles to the substrate, there are a lot of books and articles in this regard. In this point of view, there is still a field which is missed and it is rarely to find references about the effect of shot peening on cold spray coating. The authors believe that Shot-peening which is very famous in increasing the fatigue limit by applying the residual stress on the surface of specimen, might have appreciable effects on the CGDS parameters. It seems necessary to find the answers of the following questions: - What are the results of applying shot-peening before cold spray coating on substrate on the CGDS factors such as deposition efficiency, critical velocity, bounding strength, etc. This answer might be different for different materials, thus it should be experimented for many materials which are suitable for CGDS. - Are the important parameters of substrate (For instance, physical properties of substrate such as electrical and thermal conductivity, fatigue limits which somehow directly related to residual stress on the surface, ductility behavior of substrate) will change by shot-peening before and after the CGDS? These questions should be answered by both experimental test and numerical solution. R EFERENCES [1] A.Papyrin, V.Kosarev, S.Klinkov, A.Alkhimov,V.Fomin, Elsevier, (2006) [2] R.C. McCune and A.N. Papyrin, J.N. Hall, W.L. Riggs II, P.H. Zajchowski, Houston, ASM (1995), 1-5 [3] François Raletz, Michel Vardelle, Guillaume Ezo'o , Surface & Coatings Technology 201 (2006) 1942–1947 [4] A.P. Alkhimov, S.V. Klinkov, V.F. Kosarev, A.N. Paprin, J. Appl. Mech. Phys. (1997) 176-183 [5] J. Karthikeyan,Cold Spray Technology: International Status and USA, (2000) [6] US army laboratory WebPages, Cold Spray Coating application [7] T. Stoltenhoff, H. Kreye, H.J. Richter, (2002) 542-550 [8] S.V. Klinkov, V.F. Kosarev, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, (2006) 364 [9] A.A. Deribas, I.D. Zakharenko, Fisika Goreniya I Vzryva., (1974) 409–421 M