Issue 41

V.M. Machado et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 236-244; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.32 242 According to the short crack models presented above, the first should generate a non-propagating crack, see Fig. 5, whereas the second should start and propagate a crack, see Fig. 6, as indeed they did, see Fig. 7 . In the sequence, two other similar DC(T) specimens, one with notch tip radius  0.2mm and loaded by P  3.1kN and the other with  0.3mm and loaded by P  6kN , were EAC tested in the same aggressive environment, but now under EP conditions around the notch tip. Considering their size-dependent threshold J th (a) and their crack driving forces J , both specimens should withstand the loads without breaking, as indeed they did, see Fig. 8-10. Figure 5 : Curves K I (a)  a and K EACth (a)  a generated by the analysis of the linear elastic DC(T) under EAC and P  6750N. Figure 6 : Curves K I (a)  a and K EACth (a)  a generated by the analysis of the linear elastic DC(T) under EAC and P  8250N . Figure 7 : LE specimens after working 30 days under EAC conditions in an aqueous hydrogen sulfide environment.