Issue 41

D. Nowell et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 197-202; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.27 201 CJP model is helpful (i.e. is the splitting of delta K into separate K F and K R terms justified from the point of view of predicting crack behavior). Figure 5 : Results from Fig. 4, obtained by Vasco Olmo [8], re-plotted to show the variation of (K F + K R ) with loading cycle Figure 6 : Vasco Olmo’s data [8] plotted as delta K against loading cycle and compared against our own [5] (also shown in Fig.2.) C ONCLUSIONS his paper has introduced and discussed the CJP model for fatigue crack displacement, strain, and stress fields, and proposed a simplification, which seems to fit more readily with the forces acting between the plastic enclave and the surrounding elastic material. A comparison has been made between one of our own experiments, reported previously [5], and one from the group at Jaén [8]. Excellent agreement was found between the two sets of data and further collaboration to examine the full database of experimental results in a single agreed framework is proposed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS he authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr José Vasco Olmo, particularly in supplying the original data corresponding to figures 4, 5, and 6. Dr Vasco Olmo and Dr Paco Diaz are also thanked for helpful discussions during Professor Nowell’s research visit to Jaén in May 2016, and both are further thanked for their kind and generous hospitality. 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 K/K_max Normalised loading cycle K_F + K_R Nominal K T T