Issue 41

P. Lorenzino et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 191-196; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.26 194 R ESULTS AND DISCUSSION ab. 2 summarizes the fatigue tests performed at the ESRF. Two tests were carried out in each material in order to have failures above and below 100.000 cycles. For material IV, five specimens were tested since in some cases the crack nucleated from a corner of the sample instead of the artificial defect. The ability of tomography to detect accurately the size/shape of the cracks was assessed by comparing the surface crack size measured on the reconstructed images ( e.g. right image on Fig. 2) with optical images obtained on the unbroken samples. In all cases a very good correspondence was observed (less than a few percent error). It was therefore possible to monitor accurately the 3D shape of the crack steadily propagating out of the artificial defect. Material Test σ max/ σ 0.2 Cycles (x10 3 ) Failure origin I 1 0.62 61 notch I 2 0.57 160 notch II 3 0.52 71 notch II 4 0.48 125 notch III 5 0.52 30 sample corner III 6 0.47 121 notch IV 7 0.58 31 notch IV 8 0.59 60 sample corner IV 9 0.56 71.5 notch IV 10 0.63 95 sample corner IV 11 0.45 340 sample corner Table 2 : Summary of the fatigue tests carried out at the synchrotron. Regarding the initiation stages, for the cold forged materials, a larger number of cycles was required to initiate a crack from the notch for the material with the largest strain level (material II). Regarding propagation, for all materials, both the crack surfaces and crack fronts were relatively flat/smooth showing no indication of strong interactions with the local microstructure (see for example Fig. 3 for an example of the crack fronts observed in material IV). Figure 3 : Crack front shapes for Material IV σ max = 450 MPa, R=0.1. The shape of the crack fronts is relatively smooth indicating the absence of strong interaction with the local microstructure ( e.g. grains). Despite their small physical sizes, the cracks behave as ”microstructurally long” fatigue cracks with continuously increasing growth rates. Fig. 4 shows a comparison of the crack growth rates as a function of ∆K for materials III and IV. In this figure the stress intensity factor values are based on the (area) 1/2 parameter proposed by Murakami [7].