Issue 35

R. Konečná et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 35 (2016) 31-40; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.36.04 37 is demonstrated by Fig. 9b, where the secondary cracks are rarely observed. The fracture surface is again transgranular without any specific fractographic features, see region A. Region B in the figure is characteristic by elongated areas covered by fine slip lines. No secondary cracks are visible here. Arrows in Fig. 9 indicate the local direction of the crack growth. Locally it differs a lot from the macroscopic direction. Figure 9 : Fracture surface corresponding to the average crack rate 8 x 10 -7 mm/cycle The fracture surface corresponding to the crack propagation in Paris region is shown in Fig. 10. The surface was created by the crack propagating at the growth rate of 1 x 10 -5 mm/cycle. The appearance is very similar to that shown in Fig. 9. In comparison to the threshold region some of the secondary cracks are longer and more open. The traces of slip lines are also visible, see arrow in Fig. 10b. Well-developed striations appear at high crack growth rates reaching 1 x 10 -4 mm/cycle. An example is shown in Fig. 11. The striation distance roughly corresponds to the macroscopic crack growth rate. Figure 10 : Fracture surface corresponding to the average crack rate 1 x 10 -5 mm/cycle. Figure 11 : Fracture surface corresponding to the crack growth rate 1 x 10 -4 mm/cycle. Fatigue fracture profiles The fracture profiles as observed by LM on polished and etched sections in y-z plane direction and perpendicular to the fracture surface are shown in Fig. 12. The crack growth direction was from the right to the left (arrow in Fig. 12a). The fatigue crack propagates in the threshold region in a transgranular way and is obviously not influenced by the specific SLM microstructure. The fracture profile view corresponding to K a = 1.6 MPam 1/2 and da/dN ~ 10 -7 mm/cycle is flat with local small sharp asperities (Fig. 12a). Secondary cracks emanating from the main crack do not have any visible relation to the microstructure. Fig. 12b shows the crack profile typical for the Paris region. The only difference is in the roughness of the fracture profile, which is higher when compared to the roughness of the fracture profile in Fig. 12a. The crack propagation remains transgranular. A B a) b) a) b)