Issue 35

M. Bozkurt et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 35 (2016) 350-359; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.35.40 354 all the loading angle cases presented in Fig. 8-10, the ratios of SIF changes described for Fig. 7 due to thickness changes remain the same, showing consistency in the results. Figure 7 : Mixed mode SIF results for 45 degrees loading angle. Figure 8 : Mode-I SIF distributions for different loading angles ( t = 25 mm and t = 12.5 mm). Figure 9 : Mode-II SIF distributions for different loading angles ( t = 25 mm and t = 12.5 mm).