Issue34

A. Satoh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 34 (2015) 397-405; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.34.44 403 (a1) S-N-TSD1 (b1) S-A-TSD1 (c1) W-N-TSD1 (d1) W-A-TSD1 (a2) S-N-TSD2 (b2) S-A-TSD2 (c2) W-N-TSD2 (d2) W-A-TSD2 (a3) S-N-TSD3 (b3) S-A-TSD3 (c3) W-N-TSD3 (d3) W-A-TSD3 Figure 10 : Crack distribution in models at the final stage of fracture. 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 GF (N/m) Ft(N/mm 2 ) M-I M-S M-V R-I R-S R-V 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 0 25000 50000 75000 100000 Ft(N/mm 2 ) Averaged Young's modulus (MPa) M-I M-S M-V R-I R-S R-V 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Ft(N/mm 2 ) RL (mm) M-I M-S M-V R-I R-S R-V (a) Relationship between Ft and GF. (b) Relationship between E and Ft. (c) Relationship between RL and Ft. Figure 11 : Relationship between mechanical properties or between features of repair and Ft. Figure 12 : Experimental relationship.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=