Issue 29
N.A. Nodargi et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 29 (2014) 111-127; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.29.11 115 p ˆ ˆ ˆ arctan g g σ σ ε σ (20) This is a scalar equation in the unknown ˆ 0, 3 σ , which implicitly defines a function p ˆ σ ε . By applying Dini’s theorem, its first derivative turns out to be: p 2 2 ˆ d d g g g g g σ ε (21) where g and its derivatives are computed at p ˆ σ ε . Noting that p ˆ σ ε can be assumed to belong to 3, 3 , by (20) it follows that p p ˆ ˆ 2 2 2 2 cos , sin g g g g g g σ σ ε ε (22) whence, recalling (18) and (21), p ( ) D and its first and second derivatives with respect to p easily follow: p p p 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 , , g g g g g g D D D g g g g g g g g g g ε ε ε (23) where the derivatives on the right-hand sides of (23) are performed with respect to ˆ σ and computed at p ˆ σ ε . Finally the gradient and the Hessian of p D ε are straightforwardly obtained from (16): p p p 0 p p p p p p p p p p 0 y y D c D D D c D D D D ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε (24) Simple expressions for the gradient and the Hessian of p ε and p are given in Appendix A. The same argument holds if kinematic hardening is present. Deviatoric yield function, isotropic hardening The yield function is assumed to be 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ i y i , , , f q g c q σ σ σ σ σ (25) whence the dissipation function follows: p p p ˆ ˆ ˆ i ˆ ˆ y i 0 p ˆ ˆ ˆ i i i , , , , sup cos q g c q q D σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ ε ε ε ε (26) This implies: p p p 0 i y 0 p i y i i i 0, , sup q D c q D q ε ε ε ε (27) Accordingly, the dissipation function turns out to be: p p 0 p p p p 0 y i i p i y i if , if otherwise c D D c D c D ε ε ε ε ε ε ε (28)
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=